View Full Version: East in the west

Ancient and Future Catholic Forum and Discussion > Other Denominations/Communions > East in the west



Title: East in the west
Description: from "Countdown to Rome"


A Simple Sinner - March 16, 2007 08:50 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
QUOTE (A Simple Sinner @ Mar 15 2007, 04:36 AM)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 15 2007, 12:33 AM)
Ok, so not exactly the first few Asians ... But I guess my presence may probably lead to a greater Asian following within the Eastern rite, meaning more Chinese, Koreans, Thais maybe... Woohoo... I look forward to being a apart of the Eastern Catholic community and I am definitely excited about what it offers. 

Collin 


Well Collin if you ended up getting the Divine Liturgy in the BCA translated into some of those languaged, it might be just the thing we need.

Given the trajectory our church has been on for years... an infusion is urgently needed. 


Well, if i'm not mistaken, there is a Divine Liturgy in Bahasa Indonesia (Malay basically). Surprisingly, there is an Indonesian Orthodox following under the Antiochan jurisdiction if I am not mistaken.

It will take time translating the texts but I believe that once there is a number, we can get things done.


To continue on this thread.....

In the past century the Orthodox churches world wide have put a much greater emphasis on the creationg and sustaining of missions outside the "mother countries" I am aware that the Idonesisans, Malagysy (Madagascar) and Japanese & Korean Churches all have missions in those nations with the DL taken in the local vernacular.

Byzantine Catholic communities in the US have enjoyed a general influx of Latin Catholic men interested in servig them as priests - especially bi-ritual priests from orders like Franciscans and Bendictines... but many parishes are mostly maintining their numbers or getting smaller each year...

I for one think that is entirely too sad. In recent years there has been an influx of interest in liturgy and converts coming from Evangelical and Anglican liturgical backgrounds. Many of them, if they gave us half a chance, would find the sp[irituality, litturgy and special focus given to the Fathers in the East to be something they are very much at home with...


A Simple Sinner - March 16, 2007 09:09 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 16 2007, 11:50 AM)
I like Fr. Emmanuel McCarthy... He is an intellectual person, and is simply all that I wanted to be in a priest... He was a lawyer, like my Jesuit hero the late Fr. Robert Drinan, and an educator, something which has been an ambition of mine for a long time, and is a peace activist, much like what my local Jesuit lawyer priest has been doing for a long time. And interestingly, upon googling him, it is said that he has 13 children?! :blink:

Whatever it is, I can do with lesser children... I think. :P

Thank you simple Sinner! The Complicated Sinner is happy he found you... lol

Hmmm... not to get into labels or pre-judgements, if you idealize Fr. Robert Drinan, a virulent abortion rights supporter who never missed an opportunity to support total unrestricted unversal access to abortion... (see here.) I am not sure the Eastern Catholics churches would be your most comfortable fit.

I am all for idealizing Jesuits, but St. Ignatious and Russian Catholic priest and former Soviet prisoner Fr. Walter Ciszek spring to mind first.

collin_nunis - March 17, 2007 04:27 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (A Simple Sinner @ Mar 16 2007, 04:09 PM)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 16 2007, 11:50 AM)
I like Fr. Emmanuel McCarthy... He is an intellectual person, and is simply all that I wanted to be in a priest... He was a lawyer, like my Jesuit hero the late Fr. Robert Drinan, and an educator, something which has been an ambition of mine for a long time, and is a peace activist, much like what my local Jesuit lawyer priest has been doing for a long time. And interestingly, upon googling him, it is said that he has 13 children?! :blink:

Whatever it is, I can do with lesser children... I think. :P

Thank you simple Sinner! The Complicated Sinner is happy he found you... lol

Hmmm... not to get into labels or pre-judgements, if you idealize Fr. Robert Drinan, a virulent abortion rights supporter who never missed an opportunity to support total unrestricted unversal access to abortion... (see here.) I am not sure the Eastern Catholics churches would be your most comfortable fit.

I am all for idealizing Jesuits, but St. Ignatious and Russian Catholic priest and former Soviet prisoner Fr. Walter Ciszek spring to mind first.

I know what he stood for. However, I myself disagree with abortion on faith, ethical, and health reasons. I just hold him in high regard as a lawyer and a priest. Thats all. There have been worse Jesuits. At least he was obedient enough to step down from Congress upon papal directive.

What about Jon Sobrino? Is it possible to have a member who calls himself a companion of the Lord deny the divinity of the Lord Himself?

For me, other names spring to mind - former papal candidate Cardinal Mario Bergoglio, sj of Buenos Aires... Humble man who still takes the bus to work, washes the feet of 12 HIV/AIDS patients (children included) at the altar on Holy Thursday. Very revolutionary but very evangelical nonetheless. If he wasn't evangelical and conservative, i doubt he would even be considered a candidate. No liberal would be.

QUESTION: Does the Eastern Catholic Church have a rehab-like ministry for homosexuals? I know what the Church teaches about homosexuals, but just like the RC, they do allow homosexuals in the pews and they do offer a helping hand for homosexuals right?


new_catholic - March 17, 2007 05:55 PM (GMT)
Thanks for adding this thread. It makes it much easier to read...and Tony can keep his countdown going, too!

A Simple Sinner - March 17, 2007 06:05 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 16 2007, 11:27 PM)
I know what he stood for. However, I myself disagree with abortion on faith, ethical, and health reasons. I just hold him in high regard as a lawyer and a priest. Thats all. There have been worse Jesuits. At least he was obedient enough to step down from Congress upon papal directive.

What about Jon Sobrino? Is it possible to have a member who calls himself a companion of the Lord deny the divinity of the Lord Himself?

For me, other names spring to mind - former papal candidate Cardinal Mario Bergoglio, sj of Buenos Aires... Humble man who still takes the bus to work, washes the feet of 12 HIV/AIDS patients (children included) at the altar on Holy Thursday. Very revolutionary but very evangelical nonetheless. If he wasn't evangelical and conservative, i doubt he would even be considered a candidate. No liberal would be. 

QUESTION: Does the Eastern Catholic Church have a rehab-like ministry for homosexuals? I know what the Church teaches about homosexuals, but just like the RC, they do allow homosexuals in the pews and they do offer a helping hand for homosexuals right?

On Fr. Jon Sobrino I cannot comment -I don't know much of him or his case.

As to "Is it possible to have a member who calls himself a companion of the Lord deny the divinity of the Lord Himself? " Short answer? Not if you want to call yourself a Catholic.

Eastern Catholics are no different from Latins in regards to sexuality. Without special agenda for or against any one group, the church actually teaches that sex is reserved for married people open to preocreation. No special distinction is made about temptations to anything outside of that standard and ideal - weather gay or straght or swinger or whatever, sex is between a husband and wife.

I am not familiar with any "re-hab" programs, but certainly Eastern Christians are called to have a spiritual father who leads them and guides them on the upright life no matter what the temptaions they face in life are.

Simple

A Simple Sinner - March 17, 2007 06:06 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (new_catholic @ Mar 17 2007, 12:55 PM)
Thanks for adding this thread. It makes it much easier to read...and Tony can keep his countdown going, too!

you got it!

Didn't mean to steal T's thunder.... Just ended up sparking something!


collin_nunis - March 18, 2007 03:20 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (A Simple Sinner @ Mar 17 2007, 01:05 PM)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 16 2007, 11:27 PM)
I know what he stood for. However, I myself disagree with abortion on faith, ethical, and health reasons. I just hold him in high regard as a lawyer and a priest. Thats all. There have been worse Jesuits. At least he was obedient enough to step down from Congress upon papal directive.

What about Jon Sobrino? Is it possible to have a member who calls himself a companion of the Lord deny the divinity of the Lord Himself?

For me, other names spring to mind - former papal candidate Cardinal Mario Bergoglio, sj of Buenos Aires... Humble man who still takes the bus to work, washes the feet of 12 HIV/AIDS patients (children included) at the altar on Holy Thursday. Very revolutionary but very evangelical nonetheless. If he wasn't evangelical and conservative, i doubt he would even be considered a candidate. No liberal would be. 

QUESTION: Does the Eastern Catholic Church have a rehab-like ministry for homosexuals? I know what the Church teaches about homosexuals, but just like the RC, they do allow homosexuals in the pews and they do offer a helping hand for homosexuals right?

On Fr. Jon Sobrino I cannot comment -I don't know much of him or his case.

As to "Is it possible to have a member who calls himself a companion of the Lord deny the divinity of the Lord Himself? " Short answer? Not if you want to call yourself a Catholic.

Eastern Catholics are no different from Latins in regards to sexuality. Without special agenda for or against any one group, the church actually teaches that sex is reserved for married people open to preocreation. No special distinction is made about temptations to anything outside of that standard and ideal - weather gay or straght or swinger or whatever, sex is between a husband and wife.

I am not familiar with any "re-hab" programs, but certainly Eastern Christians are called to have a spiritual father who leads them and guides them on the upright life no matter what the temptaions they face in life are.

Simple

Well, Sobrino is the liberation theologian who denied the divinity of Jesus Christ. Ironic for someone from the Society of Jesus? You bet.

The Vatican was supposed to discipline him last week but they pulled back.

David Zampino - March 18, 2007 02:04 PM (GMT)
Roger Haight is also a Jesuit with very questionable theological leanings. I believe that he has been disciplined by the Vatican.

stlouismb - March 18, 2007 02:12 PM (GMT)
I would add that Vatican disciplines and sancitonings is one of the benefits of being part of the Catholic Church. There were/are plenty of questionable "theologians" in every church (even in the communion which we no longer discuss :rolleyes: ), they are rarely held to any scrutiny, though. Especially the ones who use Sola Scriptura.

collin_nunis - March 18, 2007 02:55 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (stlouismb @ Mar 18 2007, 09:12 AM)
I would add that Vatican disciplines and sancitonings is one of the benefits of being part of the Catholic Church. There were/are plenty of questionable "theologians" in every church (even in the communion which we no longer discuss :rolleyes: ), they are rarely held to any scrutiny, though. Especially the ones who use Sola Scriptura.

Well, Sola Scriptura is not that bad, if you ask me, because Catholic doctrine can be defended easily using the Sola Scriptura approach. Has been, and will be. ;) Sola Scriptura is flawed only if the writings of the Fathers are neglected. Without the writings of the Fathers, Scripture will remain unclear and thanks to the Fathers, we have a great understanding of Scripture which has led us to remain, or come to the Catholic Church.

For those who are not in communion with Rome, you can choose to do so but recognise what the Fathers say about the Bishop of Rome. When he speaks, listen.

stlouismb - March 18, 2007 07:00 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 18 2007, 08:55 AM)
Well, Sola Scriptura is not that bad, if you ask me, because Catholic doctrine can be defended easily using the Sola Scriptura approach. Has been, and will be. ;) Sola Scriptura is flawed only if the writings of the Fathers are neglected. Without the writings of the Fathers, Scripture will remain unclear and thanks to the Fathers, we have a great understanding of Scripture which has led us to remain, or come to the Catholic Church.

Yes, Collin I have had the same thought. The Fathers could be sola scriptura, but not those of us who come later. ;)

A Simple Sinner - March 19, 2007 06:55 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 18 2007, 09:55 AM)
QUOTE (stlouismb @ Mar 18 2007, 09:12 AM)
I would add that Vatican disciplines and sancitonings is one of the benefits of being part of the Catholic Church. There were/are plenty of questionable "theologians" in every church (even in the communion which we no longer discuss :rolleyes: ), they are rarely held to any scrutiny, though. Especially the ones who use Sola Scriptura.

Well, Sola Scriptura is not that bad, if you ask me, because Catholic doctrine can be defended easily using the Sola Scriptura approach. Has been, and will be. ;) Sola Scriptura is flawed only if the writings of the Fathers are neglected. Without the writings of the Fathers, Scripture will remain unclear and thanks to the Fathers, we have a great understanding of Scripture which has led us to remain, or come to the Catholic Church.

For those who are not in communion with Rome, you can choose to do so but recognise what the Fathers say about the Bishop of Rome. When he speaks, listen.

This is a bit of a simplification of the concept of sola scriptura. The driving premise of sola scriptura is that ONLY scripture is needed for a believer to know what is to be done. No sacraments, no priests, no church, etc.

collin_nunis - March 19, 2007 02:36 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (A Simple Sinner @ Mar 19 2007, 01:55 AM)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 18 2007, 09:55 AM)
QUOTE (stlouismb @ Mar 18 2007, 09:12 AM)
I would add that Vatican disciplines and sancitonings is one of the benefits of being part of the Catholic Church. There were/are plenty of questionable "theologians" in every church (even in the communion which we no longer discuss :rolleyes: ), they are rarely held to any scrutiny, though. Especially the ones who use Sola Scriptura.

Well, Sola Scriptura is not that bad, if you ask me, because Catholic doctrine can be defended easily using the Sola Scriptura approach. Has been, and will be. ;) Sola Scriptura is flawed only if the writings of the Fathers are neglected. Without the writings of the Fathers, Scripture will remain unclear and thanks to the Fathers, we have a great understanding of Scripture which has led us to remain, or come to the Catholic Church.

For those who are not in communion with Rome, you can choose to do so but recognise what the Fathers say about the Bishop of Rome. When he speaks, listen.

This is a bit of a simplification of the concept of sola scriptura. The driving premise of sola scriptura is that ONLY scripture is needed for a believer to know what is to be done. No sacraments, no priests, no church, etc.

well, to describe what you say, its SOLO SCRIPTURA as per Ken Myer's theory.

A Simple Sinner - March 19, 2007 10:10 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (collin_nunis @ Mar 19 2007, 09:36 AM)

well, to describe what you say, its SOLO SCRIPTURA as per Ken Myer's theory.

You are right. I have been participating in a forum with some SOLO folks lately, and I did not switch out of that mode when reading this.


stlouismb - April 4, 2007 11:35 PM (GMT)
A nice news post from Patrick C:

QUOTE
Friends,

I thought you might be interested to see this article of our new mission being received into the Orthodox Church.

http://www.antiochian.org/1175711970?keywords=warrenton%20va

Blessings,

Patrick


A Simple Sinner - April 5, 2007 02:11 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (stlouismb @ Apr 4 2007, 06:35 PM)
A nice news post from Patrick C:

QUOTE
Friends,

I thought you might be interested to see this article of our new mission being received into the Orthodox Church.

http://www.antiochian.org/1175711970?keywords=warrenton%20va

Blessings,

Patrick

I was familiar with this story.

Given how very rife with disunity and competing vision the "continuing Anglican movement" is, I think this is a very stable move for these folks to be making at this time. It gives them a connectedness that other "Western Non-(Roman) Catholic/Non-Orthodox" seem to be much in need of. The Utrecht OCCs, PNCC, Continuing Anglicans and the like have become rather isolated in recent years.

Well the Utrecht group has actually dived head-first into the melee of women's ordination and same-sex unions that the Anglicans have...

I wish them well in their spiritual journey!

Perhaps through their witness and devotion, they can become tools in the Lord's work of healing schism and disunity.

Simple

On another note... Bishop Herzog Papes!

kenfollis@juno.com - January 24, 2008 05:10 PM (GMT)
Great thoughts!

David Zampino - January 24, 2008 05:23 PM (GMT)
Bp. Herzog is a good man. He used to sit on the Nashotah House board of Trustees.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree